Signature size rule being relaxed?
Quote from: dvorak Impartial: remove the text under the images or move it to the right.
You haven't commented on the total size of the images being over 50kB.
@jelv how are you seeing the kb size ?
Firefox, right click the image and select View Image Info
Or right click and save the image and then go and look at it in the directory where it's saved.
Or right click and save the image and then go and look at it in the directory where it's saved.
Cheers jelv
That would be because they are scaled down from their original size That is the kb size after saving & scaling them down in Microsoft Office Picture Manager
That said I will pull then & resize them accordingly tomorrow, when I am more awake & not so rattled, before re-uploading which should bring them inline with the file kb size rule
Looks like I may either have to change file format & or open P/S & choose the suitable for web option & see if it will lower the kb
If not
Have anyone any alternate ideas how to reduce the kb to keep inline with forum rules ?
As you can see changed the pingtest 1 to a .gif & now it looks hideous, almost like pre 1995 16bit graphics @ 5.46kb
what is best for the eyes ?
That said I will pull then & resize them accordingly tomorrow, when I am more awake & not so rattled, before re-uploading which should bring them inline with the file kb size rule
Looks like I may either have to change file format & or open P/S & choose the suitable for web option & see if it will lower the kb
If not
Have anyone any alternate ideas how to reduce the kb to keep inline with forum rules ?
As you can see changed the pingtest 1 to a .gif & now it looks hideous, almost like pre 1995 16bit graphics @ 5.46kb
what is best for the eyes ?
Could you not do something like the attached?
This all seems very... (dare I say) childish. 
Quote from: jelv Could you not do something like the attached?
No as that would be taking away vital information
I have now taken this further
Since I am a paying customer. I can freely use the forum (without being accused of being confrontational & going out of my way to create issue(s) )
I most certainly do not pay to be threatened to be banned over my signature which a mod clearly approved via PM back on January 08/2014, & then changes his tune in an open forum, which then nearly started confrontations between members albeit most of us are better than that.
If need be I will put all this in writing to the head chief of staff as it is not the 1st time any Mod(s) has been called into question
It started in a PM got sorted & approved
Then it started in a hijacked public forum
That said
http://community.plus.net/forum/index.php/topic,218.0.html#post_arguments
Quote Arguments
There is a fine line between discussion and argument which is at times hard to define. In general a discussion becomes an argument when the postings become personal and if this starts to become obvious then the Moderators will take necessary action which may include removal or locking of posts.
http://community.plus.net/forum/index.php/topic,218.0.html#post_troll
Quote Trolling
A troll is a person who posts inflammatory messages, to disrupt the discussion or to upset its participants. The word, or its derivative, "trolling", is also used to describe such messages or the act of posting them. This behaviour will not be tolerated.
http://community.plus.net/forum/index.php/topic,218.0.html#post_attack
Quote Personal attacks
These are usually caused by discussions turning into serious arguments as mentioned above. Please think before posting anything that would be defined as this sort of attack. For example "Username is an idiot" Personal attacks, including those in personal forum messages or emails, are not welcome on these forums and will be dealt with firmly. As the moderators do not have access to personal forum messages or emails any action would only be in response to a specific complaint by the recipient.
http://community.plus.net/forum/index.php/topic,218.0.html#post_quote
Quote Use of Quotes
Quotes can be a very useful way of making your reply to a post clearer by indicating which post or part of a post you are referring to.
However using them incorrectly can be annoying and make threads very hard to read.
The following rule applies to the use of quotes.
Only quote the full content of a post if :-
a) it is NOT the post immediately before your reply
b) You find that your reply has been forced onto a new page (then edit in the full quote if it's needed.)
In all cases you should think before quoting and wherever possible only use a part of the post you are replying to in order to make it clear which bit of a post your reply refers to.
The Moderators will remove unnecessary full quotes where they are posted immediately after the post being replied to.
Now then
Where is the rule about Hijacking a thread ?
Does that not include the Moderators, which have to follow the same rules
