cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Degradation since 31/12/24 when 2 Openreach vans visited neighbour

jab1
Legend
Posts: 19,530
Thanks: 6,452
Fixes: 290
Registered: ‎24-02-2012

Re: Degradation since 31/12/24 when 2 Openreach vans visited neighbour

Interesting - the bad drops seem almost hourly, on the hour, which is suspicious, although your max appears to be steadily falling. As I said, I'm not a telecoms engineer, but something has suddenly started to affect your connection.

I'd wait and see what the situation is when you next speak to @Windings .

John
jab1
Legend
Posts: 19,530
Thanks: 6,452
Fixes: 290
Registered: ‎24-02-2012

Re: Degradation since 31/12/24 when 2 Openreach vans visited neighbour

Understand your reluctance.  All I can suggest at the moment is as I said above.

John
corringham
Seasoned Champion
Posts: 1,416
Thanks: 734
Fixes: 19
Registered: ‎25-09-2015

Re: Degradation since 31/12/24 when 2 Openreach vans visited neighbour

It could be worth trying a couple of other speed test benchmarks just to see if they give the same results, e.g.

corringham
Seasoned Champion
Posts: 1,416
Thanks: 734
Fixes: 19
Registered: ‎25-09-2015

Re: Degradation since 31/12/24 when 2 Openreach vans visited neighbour


@jab1 wrote:

Interesting - the bad drops seem almost hourly, on the hour, which is suspicious,


Don't forget that the graph points are only every 15 minutes, so don't give a continuous picture of the download speed.

jab1
Legend
Posts: 19,530
Thanks: 6,452
Fixes: 290
Registered: ‎24-02-2012

Re: Degradation since 31/12/24 when 2 Openreach vans visited neighbour

Noted.

John
brocola
Hooked
Posts: 8
Registered: 2 weeks ago

Re: Degradation since 31/12/24 when 2 Openreach vans visited neighbour

Thank you for highlighting this @corringham 

 

The speed tests occur every 15 mins, offset to the following times

xx:08

xx:23

xx:38

xx:53

 

The graph attempts to show change between these times, however it's artificial. Useful for tracking trends over long periods, but not necessarily accurate at a single point in time except those above.

brocola
Hooked
Posts: 8
Registered: 2 weeks ago

Re: Degradation since 31/12/24 when 2 Openreach vans visited neighbour

Have been doing some more investigation.

By default, Ookla Speedtest-cli selects the server based on certain factors which I don't yet understand (ip location or some other factor?)

It seems that within minutes of  the Openreach engineers arriving, the speed tests started selecting different servers and experiencing poor results.

I've found that hardwiring Speedtest-cli to a specific server (Iomart in this example for now), gets the expected full speed.

No idea what would have caused this, need to do more investigation. I've added the server id to the dataset - the coloured dots/lines on the chart.

The change on 31/12 is quite visible, along with the improvement since hardwiring to a specific server id yesterday,

I'll see if I can try and identify the server id(s) that's causing the poor speed tests. Maybe something changed in terms of routing, which is causing Ookla to provide a different set of servers.

Still not sure whether the Openreach visit had anything to do with it, just seems remarkably convenient timing.