Another unhappy customer
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Plusnet Community
- :
- Forum
- :
- Feedback
- :
- Plusnet Feedback
- :
- Another unhappy customer
Another unhappy customer
04-12-2014 8:35 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Andy Hill is the CEO of Plusnet. Mr Hill, if you ever read these comments why do you not do something to improve your organisation. Instead of spending vast amounts on TV advertising why don't you spend more on improving customer service for your existing customers. Recruit more people, train them better and imbue a culture of customer care and accountability. Or are you unconcerned about losing loyal customers, just as long as you attract a larger number of new ones from your marketing efforts.
Very happy to discuss with you - my number is on your database!
u
Re: Another unhappy customer
04-12-2014 9:18 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Someone will be along soon to correct you on that! He probably never stoops to reading or visiting this forum either. He could well be sat at his desk wearing headphones from which there will be his daily BT brainwashing message.
Secondly that someone will blame it all on Openreach.
Re: Another unhappy customer
04-12-2014 10:00 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: Another unhappy customer
04-12-2014 10:08 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
A warm welcome to the forums - where have you been through all of those 10 years with PN? Sorry to heard of your trials and tribulations which only PlusNET can answer. As NAT suggests, it is likely that BTOR will have had a significant role in these failings - that is not blame but an unvarnished truth - however the responsibility to manage such situations better clearly lays with PlusNET, ultimately the CEO Andy BAKER (not Hill).
The catalogue of failings you have identified paint a not untypical systematic picture of BTOR cock-ups seen time and again. Remember anything to do with everything "on the ground" is entirely within BTOR world. Knowledge of what equipment / wires etc is where should be in BTOR's database. Until earlier this year I ran a pub in which I had PN business services for 4 years. Each time BTOR attended, they looked for the place by the name the pub was called back in the early 1990s. Clearly they never found it despite PN giving BTOR the correct current name - yes BLAME laid with BTOR.
The reports on here of BTOR failure to not turn up at the appointed time (often claiming that no one was in) or not transferring the number are legion yes the BLAME lays with BTOR.
BTOR is wilful in its failings, ISPs ought to be taking them to task, however for reasons which are not apparent none of them are using the right to complain to Ofcom. That said anything they might then seek to sanction needs EU / Brussels approval.
Andy has been invited to tell of what is being done at a CEO level to drive improved performance from BTOR, but to date this forum community have not had a response.
Hopefully CRT - the PlusNET staff who look after this forum - will respond to your specific experience.
Kevin
In another browser tab, login into the Plusnet user portal BEFORE clicking the fault & ticket links
Superusers are not staff, but they do have a direct line of communication into the business in order to raise issues, concerns and feedback from the community.
If this post helped, please click the Thumbs Up and if it fixed your issue, please click the This fixed my problem green button below.
Re: Another unhappy customer
04-12-2014 10:17 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: Another unhappy customer
04-12-2014 10:19 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: Another unhappy customer
04-12-2014 10:34 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Not knowing where a property is?
Not knowing what BTOR equipment is installed at the property?
Not turning up for a booked & confirmed appointment?
Not knowing that the number was to be transferred?
Not managing the issues?
The last is clearly PlusNET, we do not have enough facts to judge the penultimate issue, though BTOR failure on this are legion around here. I await someone explaining to me how the first three substantive issues are PlusNet's fault. Assigning responsibility for failure to BTOR on those points is reasonable, however accountability fir managing the situation squarely resides with PlusNET.
Until people sort out the difference between blame / responsibility and accountability then tempers will become inflamed. As far as BTOR are concerned, both PlusNET and the end user are just customer in the same boat over whom BTOR acting as a quasi nationalised industry just don't really give a dam. Though they operate under the BT brand they might just as well be government owned - that is untouchable.
In another browser tab, login into the Plusnet user portal BEFORE clicking the fault & ticket links
Superusers are not staff, but they do have a direct line of communication into the business in order to raise issues, concerns and feedback from the community.
If this post helped, please click the Thumbs Up and if it fixed your issue, please click the This fixed my problem green button below.
Re: Another unhappy customer
04-12-2014 10:48 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
The Openreach database is updated on a daily basis using the PAF.
Even if an address cannot be found then, manual orders can still be placed for WLR.
Re: Another unhappy customer
04-12-2014 11:00 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Quote from: AndyH The Openreach database is updated on a daily basis using the PAF.
Andy,
Based on personal experience, I do not think it is that simple. Harping back to the pub, it changed its name back in the early 1990's. When I was there 2010-2014 the PAF had no record of the old name, just he current name. PlusNET never knew the old name, so could never order services against the old name (note there is no building number for this rural property) however when trying to attend site BTOR ALWAYS looked for the premises by its old name. Indeed BTOR equipment was labelled as "opposite or adjacent to the old pub name".
When trying to sort this BTOR told us that the PAF file needed to be updated, well it was up to date! BTw might be up to date - I guess it had to be to allow PlusNET to order the services... I remain convinced that BTOR is in a complete mess.
In another browser tab, login into the Plusnet user portal BEFORE clicking the fault & ticket links
Superusers are not staff, but they do have a direct line of communication into the business in order to raise issues, concerns and feedback from the community.
If this post helped, please click the Thumbs Up and if it fixed your issue, please click the This fixed my problem green button below.
Re: Another unhappy customer
04-12-2014 11:27 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
@AndyH's bit:
I'm currently going through a house move, that is failing miserably. The order started with the property being a "silver key address" which means BTO have no records, but are taking the address from the PAF. These properties appear in the address checker, but end up with a result indicating "address recognised, but cannot estimate DSL speeds".
Such a property requires a survey before the order can be confirmed ... and within 2 days, this was done. DSL checkers started saying it was connected to cab 21 (right outside) and giving speed estimates.
But looking at the checker result (using just a postcode in the address checker), I can currently see 3 different addresses that could refer to this property, including the original silver-key version and the new one added due to my order through plusnet (they differ only by the addition of the word "THE"). At our last address, there was a silver-key record for our proper address "Flat 3 ...", while service was actually provided through a record named "3rd Floor Flat ..."
It seems that BTO's record can use the PAF as a starting point, but can then branch off to become a separate entity with its own life. Subsequent changes to the PAF don't get automatically brought forward into the record for the service.
@Townman's bit:
Unfortunately, the reason things are going wrong for me is because the copper line that exists at the house is actually routed to a different DP and a cabinet in the next street.
With a line in place, including some components that can only have been added since the sell-off in the eighties, you'd expect that it ought to have been in BTO's database properly. Still...
After many appointments & external fault fixes (some no-show, and some attended), where engineers *know* where the line goes (and have given me all the routing information), the BTO system still hasn't been updated. It seems like it is almost impossible to get historical records updated. Most of the time it doesn't matter - the attending engineer can work around things. However, having the wrong cabinet in the records is fatal for an FTTC order, as the port gets allocated in the wrong DSLAM.
My bit:
It seems like Plusnet's IT system & processes work OK for standard orders, or a simple amount of failure. And that the CSC are capable of pushing a failed order on to the next step. However, there is a certain point where complex orders really need a single point of contact; someone to whom you don't need to go through a ten-minute explanation of what has happened in the past.
In the end Adam Walker has picked up my issue; it doesn't necessarily make BTO act any faster or any more reasonably, but it does save you the hassle of so many lengthy waits for the CSC phone, and so many explanations over the next failure in the chain.
Plusnet probably could do with a dozen people like that...
Using FTTC since 2011. Currently on 80/20 Unlimited Fibre Extra.
Re: Another unhappy customer
04-12-2014 11:45 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Quote Many data integrity errors exist because of the many years of manual interactions and recording associated with the copper network. As an example, a customer may provide an address and the engineer on the day has determined that the service is to be delivered to a slightly different address, e.g. Flat 1, 33 Victoria Street, not 33 Victoria Street. Although the address error is not inaccurate enough to stop service being delivered on the day, the records in the system record the line at 33 Victoria Street and no line at Flat 1. Subsequent orders be it MPF, WLR etc. rely upon the accuracy of that information to effect the correct provisioning scenario be it a working line takeover, start of a stopped line, new copper etc. Each of these scenarios impact lead time so a small data error will change the future decision making process in both the Openreach and CP systems.
This should all be changing though with the way Openreach handle addresses.
Re: Another unhappy customer
04-12-2014 11:51 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page