cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Understanding High Signal Attenuation

Mr_Paul
Seasoned Pro
Posts: 719
Thanks: 230
Fixes: 12
Registered: ‎07-06-2022

Re: Understanding High Signal Attenuation

As an aside to this thread, could someone please explain what "Line Attenuation" and "Signal Attenuation" actually mean in this context, and specifically, why they are different?

Is it just co-incidence that for both the OP and I, our Upstream Line and Signal Attenuations are the same, (2.1 in my case, 15.6 in theirs), but for the Downstream they are different, (4.5 and 4.7 for me, 33.1 and 46.3 for them)?

TIA

 

jab1
Legend
Posts: 19,118
Thanks: 6,272
Fixes: 288
Registered: ‎24-02-2012

Re: Understanding High Signal Attenuation

@Mr_Paul I, like you, would have do an online enquiry to answer the first pat of your question - sorry.

The second bit, and it is only a guess until the OP provides the data I requested, is probably due to the different distances between the properties and the Fibre cabs.

John
Mr_Paul
Seasoned Pro
Posts: 719
Thanks: 230
Fixes: 12
Registered: ‎07-06-2022

Re: Understanding High Signal Attenuation

@jab1 

Thanks for the reply.

"The second bit, and it is only a guess until the OP provides the data I requested, is probably due to the different distances between the properties and the Fibre cabs."

Yes, I'd realised that the OP being significantly further away from the cabinet than me, (they 1200 metres, me only 50 metres), was the reason they see a higher attenuation figure.

My question though, and hopefully if/when someone comes on to explain the difference between Line and Signal Attenuation this will become clear, is why (for example), I have an Upstream Line and Signal Attenuation of 2.1dB (ie the same), but my Line Attenuation is 4.5dB and the Signal Attenuation is 4.7dB.

Why are Line and Signal not the same?

In the OP's case, the difference is even more noticable: both Upstreams are 15.6, but their Downstreams are14.1 vs 33.1.

Is this in itself a clue to the problem they are having?

 

 

 

 

 

jab1
Legend
Posts: 19,118
Thanks: 6,272
Fixes: 288
Registered: ‎24-02-2012

Re: Understanding High Signal Attenuation

Why are Line and Signal not the same?

In the OP's case, the difference is even more noticable: both Upstreams are 15.6, but their Downstreams are14.1 vs 33.1.

Is this in itself a clue to the problem they are having?

@Mr_Paul  In answer to the question above, I don't personally think so - I suspect the high d/s SNR is more relevant.

John
MisterW
Superuser
Superuser
Posts: 16,217
Thanks: 6,195
Fixes: 447
Registered: ‎30-07-2007

Re: Understanding High Signal Attenuation

Courtesy of Kitz https://kitz.co.uk/adsl/linestats.htm#Signal_v_Line_Attenuation

 ~ What is the difference between Line Attenuation and Signal Attenuation?

Routers that display two sets of attenuation figures are usually reporting the Signal Attenuation and Line Attenuation.   In these cases it can be taken to mean:-

  • Line (or Loop) Attenuation is an average of all the tones available for use in the relevant dsl spectrum - regardless of if the tones are in use or not.
    Loop attenuation is calculated during the transceiver training phase of the initialisation process and is an estimation of the line attenuation averaged through all the upstream or downstream subcarriers.
  • Signal Attenuation is monitored and reported as an ongoing process and can sometimes be affected by ongoing changes in line conditions. Calculation is performed as the difference between the power transmitted at the far end and the power received at the near end.
    Signal attenuation is based an average of the frequency bins in use during showtime and therefore it is not considered unusual if Signal attenuation is slightly lower than Line attenuation.

 

Superusers are not staff, but they do have a direct line of communication into the business in order to raise issues, concerns and feedback from the community.

Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Understanding High Signal Attenuation

EDIT - POST DELETED - as @MisterW  had a better answer

Baldrick1
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 12,374
Thanks: 5,555
Fixes: 430
Registered: ‎30-06-2016

Re: Understanding High Signal Attenuation

So my simple interpretation is that the Line Attenuation is a reference value determined when the line is initialised. Signal Attenuation reflects the present real world situation. The difference gives an indication of varying interference/cross talk that knock out broadband tones or a high impedance cable connection.

Assuming that this is correct, the questions that come to mind are what are the time scales for the two to be updated and is the difference a factor in triggering DLM action, or is that simply determined by error count? There’s obviously a lot of interesting material here for the geeks amongst us.

Moderator and Customer
If this helped - select the Thumb
If it fixed it,  help others - select 'This Fixed My Problem'

jab1
Legend
Posts: 19,118
Thanks: 6,272
Fixes: 288
Registered: ‎24-02-2012

Re: Understanding High Signal Attenuation

@Baldrick1 I agree, but it is likely to confuse the OP. 😀 Any chance of taking it elsewhere? 😉

John
itlity
Grafter
Posts: 80
Thanks: 2
Registered: ‎31-07-2007

Re: Understanding High Signal Attenuation

Hi John,

Apologies for reverting late.

Note that I had a couple of disconnections in sequence yesterday which led to PlusNet resetting some settings -download speed went down to 3.5Mps. I guess that reset leads to some broadband tests which are not aligned with the situation I had earlier.

Now this does not change the NSR and Line Attenuation, but the download speed is better aligned with the max available speed now. That said, it was the same as when the OpenReach engineer came over last time, and then after a few weeks the download speed went back to 7.8Mbps with some times massive drops to 1.5Mps. I would expect to face the same again as I still suspect there is an issue with the overhead cable.

Anyway, first thing first: I am on an FTTC, not ADSL as I wrongly stated previously.

I ran the Quiet Line Test and had no noise on the line.

The BT Broadband Test gave me that:

WhatsApp Image 2023-07-21 at 14.55.44.jpg

The BTW Performance Test led to:

WhatsApp Image 2023-07-21 at 14.54.41.jpg

And the current Technical Log - Information webpage of the router is:

image.png

As pointed out above, it's only up for 20 hours as we had to reset the line yesterday.

bmc
Hero
Posts: 3,901
Thanks: 1,379
Fixes: 60
Registered: ‎28-02-2017

Re: Understanding High Signal Attenuation

@itlity 

The results show you're on a FTTP Priority Exchange. Given the speeds shown I would expect OR to be planning FTTP unless you're way out in the sticks and it's unaffordable.

 

You can check the following sites

https://www.openreach.com/

https://checker.ofcom.org.uk/

 

Note Ofcam only shows active networks - not those in planning or build.

 

Brian

itlity
Grafter
Posts: 80
Thanks: 2
Registered: ‎31-07-2007

Re: Understanding High Signal Attenuation

We are remote, there are about 4 houses over a 2km road stretch -and not on an A or B road, so don't think it would make sense economically to have FTTP.

Having a 13Mbps connection at our place is already a great gift, to be honest.

jab1
Legend
Posts: 19,118
Thanks: 6,272
Fixes: 288
Registered: ‎24-02-2012

Re: Understanding High Signal Attenuation

@itlity You will end up with FTTP - eventually. Any results to post, please?

John
itlity
Grafter
Posts: 80
Thanks: 2
Registered: ‎31-07-2007

Re: Understanding High Signal Attenuation

Test results were posted just a few minutes ago.

jab1
Legend
Posts: 19,118
Thanks: 6,272
Fixes: 288
Registered: ‎24-02-2012

Re: Understanding High Signal Attenuation

Ooops, sorry, I missed them as the page dropped to the last reply, not first unread.

TBH, given the data in your reply, I can see nothing particularly out of place. I need to go out for a couple of hours, but I'll take a closer look when I get back.

John
bmc
Hero
Posts: 3,901
Thanks: 1,379
Fixes: 60
Registered: ‎28-02-2017

Re: Understanding High Signal Attenuation

@itlity 

I presume the OR site didn't show any plans for FTTP.

 

If you did through the site you'll find an Enquiry page where you can submit a question. Ask if their are any plans, given you're on a FTTP Priority Exchange.

 

Brian