Suspicion
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Plusnet Community
- :
- Forum
- :
- Feedback
- :
- Community Site Feedback
- :
- Suspicion
Suspicion
28-02-2009 8:21 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Unfortunately, it quickly became apparent in the above example that this person was never going to be capable of conducting a reasoned, normal discussion and I believe that to allow threads like this to continue is fruitless.
In fact, my suspicious mind and his imbalanced argument makes me wonder if this particular 'customer' had a hidden agenda, particularly as by his own confession he had access to three ISPs.
The whole saga left a bad taste - people who tried to help were unnecessarily disparaged. In cases like this, could the moderators (and yes, I know you are independent) and Plusnet not get together to sort problems out in private?
This particular correspondent, fueled by the fact that he was airing his 'opinions' in public view, was clearly taking great delight in abusing all and sundry. In my opinion he should have been banned early in the thread as he had clearly breached the rules on behaviour.
jim:green post modified to reflect move to new location mod:end
Re: Suspicion
28-02-2009 11:16 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
While your sentiments are appreciated we always try to avoid a ban except in extreme circumstances.
I could point to a number of other threads where the OP started off in a similarly antagonistic mode and after a number of posts from moderators and other users calmed down and the actual problem addressed.
We do as moderators tend to err on the side of moderation as handing out bans after a few stroppy posts would definitely be counter-productive and lead to accusations of dictatorship etc.
Re: Suspicion
28-02-2009 11:42 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: Suspicion
28-02-2009 11:43 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: Suspicion
28-02-2009 11:54 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
However, in this particular case the OP became abusive and spiteful to individual members quite early on.
I appreciate that it is a hard decision for you to make and I am not criticizing the moderators or Plusnet but I still feel that there was something odd about this particular thread. At least a warning might have served to restrain things a little.
I realise that I may look at things rather differently from the majority of members but I still believe that the openness of Plusnet and this forum should not be taken as an excuse for bad manners.
Re: Suspicion
28-02-2009 3:44 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
I do agree that ranting and raving doesn't really help.
Yes the mods do a sterling job, esp.
Re: Suspicion
28-02-2009 4:30 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: Suspicion
28-02-2009 4:38 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: Suspicion
28-02-2009 5:18 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
If there was a mistake it was the community trying to be too helpful, in cases like this it is best not to feed the trolls. And by moderating any of his post would have just given him more ammo. I would have considered removing some of the more critical post aimed at him. But then the last a moderator came to the defense of another forum user and did that the user took offence.
So overall think it was handled well.
Re: Suspicion
28-02-2009 5:51 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Sadly being a public Forum this mischievous thread will now be picked up by google.
Could the mods have done better?
I don't believe so! This was a classic "Damned if you do, Damned if you don't" scenario and given that, I believe it was handled well. Most of the Community responses were attempting to be helpful, but this guy just did not want to provide enough info to be helped.
If its a 'one off' we have learned from it. If it occurs again, we will be better prepared.
Superusers are not staff, but they do have a direct line of communication into the business in order to raise issues, concerns and feedback from the community.
Re: Suspicion
28-02-2009 6:10 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
If we are better prepared in the event of any re-occurrence then it (and this discussion) has been of some benefit.
Thank you for all your responses.
Re: Suspicion
28-02-2009 7:57 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: Suspicion
28-02-2009 9:10 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: Suspicion
28-02-2009 9:12 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
I suppose though you'd have business grade as opposed to consumer grade ADSL wouldn't you but yes could be a student residence.
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page