Are we using Carrier Grade NAT now?
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Plusnet Community
- :
- Forum
- :
- Help with my Plusnet services
- :
- Everything else
- :
- Re: Are we using Carrier Grade NAT now?
Are we using Carrier Grade NAT now?
27-06-2024 9:07 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Just noticed my gateway address is:
172.16.15.174
So a 20bit private network.
So does this mean that plus.net is doing NAT in its network? When did this happen? Have I just been slow in noticing?
Re: Are we using Carrier Grade NAT now?
27-06-2024 9:38 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Thread moved from Broadband to Everything Else
Moderator and Customer
If this helped - select the Thumb
If it fixed it, help others - select 'This Fixed My Problem'
Re: Are we using Carrier Grade NAT now?
27-06-2024 9:55 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Just noticed my gateway address is:
172.16.15.174
@summers Gateway addresses have always been non-routable. It doesn't mean that CGNAT is being used, and it isn't!.
Superusers are not staff, but they do have a direct line of communication into the business in order to raise issues, concerns and feedback from the community.
Re: Are we using Carrier Grade NAT now?
27-06-2024 10:07 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Ah yes I see, my ip 51.7.13.47 is routable, but it goes via a gateway that isn't routable! Never noticed that before.
Re: Are we using Carrier Grade NAT now?
27-06-2024 10:18 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
AIUI you have a direct PPP connection to the gateway, all outbound traffic goes directly down the PPP tunnel and so its (the gateway) address is never used as an outbound route. Inbound traffic is routed to your gateway (since its routable on the private PN/BT network) and then directly back to you down the PPP tunnel.
Superusers are not staff, but they do have a direct line of communication into the business in order to raise issues, concerns and feedback from the community.
Re: Are we using Carrier Grade NAT now?
27-06-2024 10:27 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
I see, yes my route has a default route to the gateway, so knows how to route that independent of it being public or private.
Then yes I guess on the otherside BT/Plusnet know that to route to my machine, they send it via a private ip address, that is known to BT/plusnet.
So yes it works, just interesting that the gateway isn't and can't be known about; out in the the general internet.
So makes me wonder what a traceroute gives from outside, as the traceroute to the gateway has to fail.
Re: Are we using Carrier Grade NAT now?
27-06-2024 5:01 PM - edited 27-06-2024 5:18 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
If you are interested you can perform a traceroute to your router using either of these links, you'll need your broadband/public IP Address
https://dnschecker.org/online-traceroute.php or https://www.thinkbroadband.com/tools/traceroute
Important the router needs ping (ICMP) replies enabled, for a Hub Two look in
Home >Advanced settings >Firewall >Configuration >Incoming ping - make YES
Re: Are we using Carrier Grade NAT now?
27-06-2024 5:27 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Interesting the online one:
tart: 2024-06-27T21:22:19+0500 HOST: DNSChecker.org Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1.|-- ??? 100.0 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.|-- 10.74.11.36 0.0% 3 0.4 0.7 0.4 1.1 0.4 3.|-- ??? 100.0 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.|-- 143.244.192.172 0.0% 3 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.7 0.2 5.|-- 143.244.225.216 0.0% 3 0.8 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.1 6.|-- 143.244.225.143 0.0% 3 0.8 0.8 0.7 1.0 0.1 7.|-- NYIIX-gig1-0.ukcore.bt.net (198.32.160.80) 0.0% 3 1.1 3.2 1.0 7.7 3.9 8.|-- ixp1-ae-4.us-ash.gia.bt.net (166.49.195.133) 0.0% 3 6.0 6.2 6.0 6.5 0.2 9.|-- t2c3-xe-7-1-0-2.uk-lof.gia.bt.net (166.49.195.140) 0.0% 3 79.4 81.8 79.4 86.2 3.8 10.|-- t2c4-et-3-0-2-1.uk-lof.gia.bt.net (166.49.250.53) 0.0% 3 79.4 79.5 79.4 79.5 0.1 11.|-- 166-49-209-195.gia.bt.net (166.49.209.195) 0.0% 3 79.7 79.6 79.5 79.7 0.1 12.|-- core2-hu0-15-0-4.southbank.ukcore.bt.net (109.159.252.143) 0.0% 3 79.8 80.0 79.8 80.3 0.3 13.|-- ??? 100.0 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.|-- ??? 100.0 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.|-- 47.13.7.51.dyn.plus.net (51.7.13.47) 66.7% 3 108.1 108.1 108.1 108.1 0.0
vs one on the router
traceroute to 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8), 30 hops max, 46 byte packets
1 * * *
2 * * *
3 136.hiper04.sheff.dial.plus.net.uk (195.166.143.136) 27.440 ms 27.688 ms 27.561 ms
4 peer3-et7-0-2.slough.ukcore.bt.net (194.72.16.68) 32.161 ms peer2-et3-1-2.slough.ukcore.bt.net (194.72.16.212) 27.767 ms 27.664 ms
5 109.159.253.235 (109.159.253.235) 26.863 ms 109.159.253.237 (109.159.253.237) 29.946 ms 109.159.253.189 (109.159.253.189) 27.046 ms
6 192.178.97.49 (192.178.97.49) 29.240 ms * *
7 dns.google (8.8.8.8) 27.397 ms 142.250.215.125 (142.250.215.125) 29.077 ms dns.google (8.8.8.8) 28.088 ms
So yes the two routers closes to me don't give a reply, which is that have private IP number makes their IP routing hard (unless they do NAT). So that could explain the *** ; rather than the machines just not responding to traceroutes.
It still amuses me that after a few hops inside plus.net it flips onto the main bt core network
Re: Are we using Carrier Grade NAT now?
27-06-2024 5:58 PM - edited 27-06-2024 6:01 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Here's mtr (my trace route) from me to you, I have a static public IP Address so my route is slightly different
mtr -w -z 51.7.13.47
Start: 2024-06-27T17:53:57+0100
HOST: wireguard Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. AS??? 192.168.10.1 0.0% 10 4.2 4.5 4.1 5.4 0.5
2. AS6871 254.core.plus.net 0.0% 10 10.8 11.0 10.7 11.7 0.3
3. AS6871 84.93.253.119 0.0% 10 11.5 12.0 11.3 13.7 0.8
4. AS2856 195.99.125.138 0.0% 10 11.7 11.9 11.2 14.3 1.0
5. AS??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6. AS??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
7. AS6871 47.13.7.51.dyn.plus.net 0.0% 10 38.0 38.1 36.6 41.1 1.5
traceroute * * * usually means the device does not respond to ping
windows tracert reports
tracert 51.7.13.47
Tracing route to 47.13.7.51.dyn.plus.net [51.7.13.47]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.10.1
2 9 ms 8 ms 9 ms 254.core.plus.net [195.166.130.254]
3 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms 84.93.253.119
4 9 ms 13 ms 9 ms 195.99.125.138
5 * * * Request timed out.
6 * * * Request timed out.
7 36 ms 38 ms 36 ms 47.13.7.51.dyn.plus.net [51.7.13.47]
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Plusnet Community
- :
- Forum
- :
- Help with my Plusnet services
- :
- Everything else
- :
- Re: Are we using Carrier Grade NAT now?