cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Vigor 130 vs 166/167 for 65mbs VDSL2 line

Somerset
Hooked
Posts: 7
Registered: ‎02-08-2023

Vigor 130 vs 166/167 for 65mbs VDSL2 line

Hello Everyone, I would appreciate you comments regarding which Dray Tek Vigor modem I should go for. I have a VDSL2 line, around 65mbs and I need a modem to use with my Netgear AX2400 (RX30)

The Vigor 130 seems the obvious choice but I like the idea of the second ethernet connection (for monitoring /DSL status etc) offered by the 166 and 167  models but they are more costly and I’m not convinced that the extra cost is justified.

The 166 has the benefit of some future proofing via the inclusion of G.Fast but Open Reach don’t plan to offer anything other than the existing service for quite a few years

2 REPLIES 2
Mav
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 22,689
Thanks: 4,865
Fixes: 518
Registered: ‎06-04-2007

Re: Vigor 130 vs 166/167 for 65mbs VDSL2 line

Moderator's note(s):

Thread moved from Broadband to Everything Else.

Forum Moderator and Customer
Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear, not absence of fear - Mark Twain
He who feared he would not succeed sat still

Dan_the_Van
Hero
Posts: 3,087
Thanks: 1,521
Fixes: 90
Registered: ‎25-06-2007

Re: Vigor 130 vs 166/167 for 65mbs VDSL2 line

I see you've sort of asked this question before.

Unless you have an internet connection prone to disconnects and you want to monitor them, I would save your money and carry on using the Hub two in bridge mode.

At some point you will be going to Full Fibre so any presumed future proofing would be lost as any modem device would become redundant.