cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Doing away with the ONT

Jovin123
Grafter
Posts: 42
Thanks: 5
Registered: ‎03-11-2015

Doing away with the ONT

Hi

When we changed to FTTP last year it seemed like a bit of a retrograde step to have a separate ONT with it's cables and power requirement. This is especially true since I bought a Fritz!box 5530 which has it's own currently unused GPON fibre port that could render the Openreach ONT redundant.

 I understand the ONT is registered on the Openreach system and I wondered if anyone had any knowledge or rumour as to when it may be possible for a customer to register their own device or know the practical and/or technical reasons why it's not (as far as I know) currently possible.

Best regards to All

John

 

6 REPLIES 6
Baldrick1
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 12,551
Thanks: 5,729
Fixes: 430
Registered: ‎30-06-2016

Re: Doing away with the ONT

@Jovin123 
I suspect that whilst this might be technically feasible, it comes down to contractual boundaries. The Openreach supplied service interface to the property is the output of the ONT, not the fibre entering your premises. I doubt this will change.

I have read that there are Altnets who connect the incoming fibre directly to the router.

Moderator and Customer
If this helped - select the Thumb
If it fixed it,  help others - select 'This Fixed My Problem'

MisterW
Superuser
Superuser
Posts: 16,533
Thanks: 6,390
Fixes: 456
Registered: ‎30-07-2007

Re: Doing away with the ONT

or know the practical and/or technical reasons why it's not (as far as I know) currently possible

On the FTTP network, downstream data is broadcast to all ONTs on the circuit. Data is identified with the ONT ID so that only the ONT with the correct ID actually receives the data. See here https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/catalyst-pon-series/216230-understand-gpon-techn...

As you say, the ONT ID is registered on the Openreach system so that the correct data is received.

Superusers are not staff, but they do have a direct line of communication into the business in order to raise issues, concerns and feedback from the community.

Jovin123
Grafter
Posts: 42
Thanks: 5
Registered: ‎03-11-2015

Re: Doing away with the ONT

@Baldrick1 

OK Thanks for that. I wonder if it a similar scenario as when broadband first became available and required an engineer visit to install a modem. If so I suppose that could change in the future but it's probably not a good idea to hold my breath waiting! 🤣

Jovin123
Grafter
Posts: 42
Thanks: 5
Registered: ‎03-11-2015

Re: Doing away with the ONT

@MisterW yep I get (basically) how it currently works. I guess to be able to register your own device a standard would have to be devised and implemented in order to do so. Knowing how slowly the wheels of industry turn I suspect this might take a while!

bmc
Hero
Posts: 4,043
Thanks: 1,441
Fixes: 61
Registered: ‎28-02-2017

Re: Doing away with the ONT

@Baldrick1 

B4RN is one such Altnet. They have an internal box about the size of an ONT which simply acts as a connection point (no power required). The Zytel router is connected via a short Fibre Optic lead and acts as the ONT.

 

Brian

krusty
Rising Star
Posts: 109
Thanks: 17
Registered: ‎09-08-2017

Re: Doing away with the ONT

whilst sfp+ pon transceivers exist, and also so does ont-routers exist, there is the network boundry which currently for OR is the ont. To move it to either the csp or the router would cause alot of problems.

 

The ont only uses around 3 to 6w (more 3 from memory), it also becomes upgradable or replaceable without other network equipment being displaced.

 

its not a retrograde move but one of flexibility - unless you like the "all in one box" ideal