Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Newest forum rule concerns
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Plusnet Community
- :
- Forum
- :
- Feedback
- :
- Plusnet Feedback
- :
- Re: Newest forum rule concerns
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
Re: Newest forum rule concerns
06-06-2014 11:59 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
@Chris
For one
The questions were asked in the opening post tbh, & the edited in to avoid scrolling up / down, dependent on your settings
Still remains unanswered
So what happens when the the moderator(s) break the rules etc as stated above & seemingly gets away with breaking them ?
Are they not bound by the very rules the must implement ?
Or
Do they have a different set of rules (that are seemingly to be made up as we go along the mulberry bush)
also please see Reply #7 where I asked you to advise on the difference between clarity & being accused of stirring things up & what you propose to do about it
For one
The questions were asked in the opening post tbh, & the edited in to avoid scrolling up / down, dependent on your settings
Still remains unanswered
Quote from: TORPC <snip>
So tell me if a Moderators post gets reported for breaking the rules for say (being derogatory towards a person) (flaunting the rules) (Racist / offensive avatars) etc
Will the Moderator(s) in question be spoken to / (posts removed) or will the reporter be the one to get a warning ?
<snip>
So what happens when the the moderator(s) break the rules etc as stated above & seemingly gets away with breaking them ?
Are they not bound by the very rules the must implement ?
Or
Do they have a different set of rules (that are seemingly to be made up as we go along the mulberry bush)
also please see Reply #7 where I asked you to advise on the difference between clarity & being accused of stirring things up & what you propose to do about it
Re: Newest forum rule concerns
06-06-2014 12:01 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Quote So tell me if a Moderators post gets reported for breaking the rules for say (being derogatory towards a person) (flaunting the rules) (Racist / offensive avatars) etc
Will the Moderator(s) in question be spoken to / (posts removed) or will the reporter be the one to get a warning ?
I have replied in my previous post.
Quote also please see Reply #7 where I asked you to advise on the difference between clarity & being accused of stirring things up & what you propose to do about it
It is not my place to take action on this, I am not a moderator of these forums. I am happy to discuss this with the moderators, however any action required is decided by the moderation team.
Former Plusnet Staff member. Posts after 31st Jan 2020 are not on behalf of Plusnet.
Re: Newest forum rule concerns
06-06-2014 2:35 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Just for the record, I perceive no major problems in interpretation of the revised rules.
They are deliberately left 'open' to allow the moderators some flexibility without having to pedantically change the rules too frequently. (My interpretation)
Being a Mod is not an easy task, so let's try and make things work well.
E.g. The last few weeks have seen a number of potentially 'tricky' threads that have all been managed amicably, resulting in good debate. I hope we can retain that status quo.
M
They are deliberately left 'open' to allow the moderators some flexibility without having to pedantically change the rules too frequently. (My interpretation)
Being a Mod is not an easy task, so let's try and make things work well.
E.g. The last few weeks have seen a number of potentially 'tricky' threads that have all been managed amicably, resulting in good debate. I hope we can retain that status quo.
M
Superusers are not staff, but they do have a direct line of communication into the business in order to raise issues, concerns and feedback from the community.
Re: Newest forum rule concerns
06-06-2014 2:58 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
I quess that post #4 meets your requirements
Which that kind of behaviour, I hope will be nipped in the bud
Which that kind of behaviour, I hope will be nipped in the bud
Re: Newest forum rule concerns
07-06-2014 2:20 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Whilst we are discussing the rules in a civilised manner
Can we have the Language / Signature rules to be clear, in that it is ok, to have a different / foreign language in the signature
Or if it is not ok, then make that clear in the rules
Please refer to this thread for clarification
Can we have the Language / Signature rules to be clear, in that it is ok, to have a different / foreign language in the signature
Or if it is not ok, then make that clear in the rules
Please refer to this thread for clarification
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page