Plusnet - Sales Misrepresentation Act 1967
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Plusnet Community
- :
- Forum
- :
- Feedback
- :
- Plusnet Feedback
- :
- Plusnet - Sales Misrepresentation Act 1967
Plusnet - Sales Misrepresentation Act 1967
09-05-2009 11:13 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Regards,
Christian Doughton
Re: Plusnet - Sales Misrepresentation Act 1967
09-05-2009 11:35 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
I was only thinking this morning what is the point of BTw spending bilions providing high speed interenet when it can't be used to it's full benefit because of restrictions imposed by ISP's.
Re: Plusnet - Sales Misrepresentation Act 1967
09-05-2009 11:48 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Quote you get unlimited downloads from Midnight to 8am
This was an accident waiting to happen!!! It all boils down to the definition of 'Unlimited'. Plusnet, after a long period of saying that Unlimited broadband was a myth, finally capitulated with the Product Refresh and started to use the same pitch as other ISP's. It's still a myth though!! .
As glloyd says , in this context Unlimited ONLY applies to the total amount downloaded and NOT to the speed. This is in common with other ISP's and in Plusnets defence (no I dont work for them! ) they do clearly state how the speeds are restricted, unlike most other ISP's.
That I guess doesnt help you doughc, and it MAY be that the salesman should have explained more fully, but it does I hope explain the situation.
Superusers are not staff, but they do have a direct line of communication into the business in order to raise issues, concerns and feedback from the community.
Re: Plusnet - Sales Misrepresentation Act 1967
09-05-2009 2:28 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
If you want to compare products http://www.kitz.co.uk/isp/plusnet_shaping2.htm
"Unlimited" starts at £11.99 then £15.99 if you're on a market 3 exchange otherwise £19.99. Pro is £19.99 12 month contract.
Whilst I in no way defend what you have been told by sales or their attitude, did you not following this link Read more info on the main website. The information is displayed and you would have been able to cancel without penalty in 7 days?
Who was your previous supplier by the way?
Re: Plusnet - Sales Misrepresentation Act 1967
09-05-2009 5:08 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Must get my brain ( or my eyes ) seen too...
Superusers are not staff, but they do have a direct line of communication into the business in order to raise issues, concerns and feedback from the community.
Re: Plusnet - Sales Misrepresentation Act 1967
10-05-2009 9:05 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
There should BE BIG LETTERS UNDER THE PRODUCT - SPEED RESTRICTIONS APPLY WITH THIS PRODUCT (IT IS NOT UNLIMITED MIDNIGHT - 8AM) You are talking amount of downloads not linespeed BUT IT APPLIES TO BOTH! Unlimited should mean unlimited speed unlimited download not just ONE? In response to a previous question my line speed is 5.5 Mbs. I feel I have been mislead but Plusnet just quote you should have read terms and conditions and also say I could have cancelled in 7 DAYS! I was told when I first mentioned the problem that my line may be adjusting to speed! 7 DAYS it is a joke and they should get there sales pitch correct.
This must of happened many times, people jumping at them for the Value price and realising that there upscaled packages are not only limited but more expense than other companies, no one wants to know they feel like they have you by the short and curlies! I did try to resolve, I just hope that this post may help others before they make the same mistake. I could go to OFFCOM and use the Sales Misrep Act, I will have a think about this I am sure they get plenty of phone calls about telephone sales pitches and they will understand considering my circumstances mentioned - why would I have changed in the first place if I had not been mislead into believing what the salesman said?
Re: Plusnet - Sales Misrepresentation Act 1967
10-05-2009 10:57 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: Plusnet - Sales Misrepresentation Act 1967
10-05-2009 11:30 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
http://community.plus.net/forum/index.php/topic,74056.0.html ; http://community.plus.net/forum/index.php/topic,74429.0.html
Oh and there is this http://community.plus.net/forum/index.php/topic,75545.0.html
Re: Plusnet - Sales Misrepresentation Act 1967
10-05-2009 2:19 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Re: Plusnet - Sales Misrepresentation Act 1967
10-05-2009 3:40 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Quote Why would he say UNLIMITED P2P Midnight to 8am
they were talking about it being unlimited usage(free) on the value product
And this is why the new unlimited product should be called plusnet unmetered http://community.plus.net/forum/index.php/topic,74056.msg590818.html#msg590818
Re: Plusnet - Sales Misrepresentation Act 1967
10-05-2009 6:30 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Quote from: Be3G What I want to know is, was what the salesperson said just his own 'view' on things or actual Plusnet policy to market the product in that way? If it was the former, then it was maybe forgivable as people do obviously make mistakes. If it was the latter however, then... I'm appalled.
But a salesman should not be giving his own view on things. He is there to sell a product. If he tells you things that are his view, but are in fact misleading then its not a good place for Plusnet to be in.
Unlimited is a really bad thing to use in a description and I agree with everyone else who said that the minute PN started using it, after saying bad things about other ISPs using it, that it was going to troublesome.
Re: Plusnet - Sales Misrepresentation Act 1967
11-05-2009 12:42 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
We've tried calling you a couple of times today.
Could you please PM me with a suitable number and time to call?
Re: Plusnet - Sales Misrepresentation Act 1967
11-05-2009 5:13 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
It took a few days but I feel that I was taken seriously in the end and I must say that I am now happy.
Thanks for the replies.
Christian
Peace out.
Re: Plusnet - Sales Misrepresentation Act 1967
11-05-2009 6:05 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
iam sure you will be happy with the unlimited (usage) package.
seems PN have informed you of the full deatils of the package but if you want to double check the expected speeds on unlimited have a look here
http://www.plus.net/support/broadband/quality_broadband/speed.shtml
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Plusnet Community
- :
- Forum
- :
- Feedback
- :
- Plusnet Feedback
- :
- Plusnet - Sales Misrepresentation Act 1967