Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Reaching BTO
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Plusnet Community
- :
- Forum
- :
- Feedback
- :
- Plusnet Feedback
- :
- Re: Reaching BTO
- « Previous
- Next »
Re: Reaching BTO
22-11-2014 11:55 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
What is, I think you're talking about something different.
Quote from: Anotherone TOTALLY in breach of OFCOM rules.
![Huh Huh](/html/@3681646702FDFD32BCA97E2E5F1BDDD5/images/emoticons/huh.gif)
I was referring to the free call divert etc. that BT retail do pretty automatically that was being referred to in preceding posts.
![Wink Wink](/html/@0FA1396AC0773F33E2DC472BB4F75D3C/images/emoticons/wink.gif)
And there are other one-off costs/charges that BT Retail routinely seem to absorb but PN don't, though that may be more to do with overall package pricing.
Re: Reaching BTO
22-11-2014 2:06 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Quote from: HPsauce From a BT corporate point of view of course it makes sense, limits costs for customers not committed to BT yet provides a better service to those that are.
That comes across as suggesting customers within BT Group should/do get a better service. Maybe that's not what you intended.
Re: Reaching BTO
22-11-2014 2:59 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Depends how you read it, as a sentence/phrase it's a bit muddy (especially just repeated out of context), let me reword and clarify:
From a BT corporate point of view of course it (free call diversion as provided routinely by BT retail but not PN) makes sense; it limits costs (to BT Group) for customers not committed to BT (i.e. not BT Retail ) yet provides a better service to those that are (BT retail customers).
(And in reality the cost of providing this is minimal)
From a BT corporate point of view of course it (free call diversion as provided routinely by BT retail but not PN) makes sense; it limits costs (to BT Group) for customers not committed to BT (i.e. not BT Retail ) yet provides a better service to those that are (BT retail customers).
(And in reality the cost of providing this is minimal)
Re: Reaching BTO
22-11-2014 3:18 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report to Moderator
Quote Depends on how you read it.
Exactly.
As for the rest, it makes no sense at all. PN is owned by BT Retail, so they are "committed" to BT. Oh it limits BT Group costs all right with PN not providing it, the customer is paying extra for the privilege of having a fault, which Openreach can take their time over fixing.
Townman's suggestion was that it should be Openreach who should provide the Divert FOC if one is required. After all, who makes most money from the Divert - Openreach - the CP makes very little profit on the call cost on divert and the setting up is negligible.
So Openreach would lose the rake-off for an End User having a phone fault and that should be a huge incentive to get a repair done in a quick and cost effective manner.
- « Previous
- Next »
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page