Limit to period where a post can be edited

artmo · ‎12-08-2007

@DomS, I agree with you. Not all the people 'did a runner' some are still around. If a person makes a comment then he/she should stand by it - or apologise!!

dvorak · ‎11-01-2008

After 6 months of this rule been in place we've had no complaints and very few amendment requests.
I think it's working well.

Customer / Moderator
If it helped click the thumb
If it fixed it click 'This fixed my problem'

MauriceC · ‎10-04-2007

I was initially apprehensive about this proposal., The lengthy discussion on the 'Why's' and the alternatives changed my mind into voting for the compromise time limit of one day. As Dvorac says, it seems to be working well and not causing any bother for the Mods.
Leave the rule in place.
m

Superusers are not staff, but they do have a direct line of communication into the business in order to raise issues, concerns and feedback from the community.

Anotherone · ‎31-08-2007

Quote from: DomS
Having watched members throw their toys out of the pram previously, go back through and edit or blank out all their old posts (sometimes with quite rude comments) and then do a runner, I can see the advantages of having this limit.

And how often did that occur?
On the fairly few instances that I've seen that, the offending poster should have at least been suspended, if not banned way before.
Still, I'm glad the rule seems to be working OK then.

VileReynard · ‎01-09-2007

So what is the limit then?

"In The Beginning Was The Word, And The Word Was Aardvark."

TORPC · ‎08-12-2013

I think 24hrs =====> 1 Day
However I could be mistaken

Limit to period where a post can be edited

Re: Limit to period where a post can be edited

Re: Limit to period where a post can be edited

Re: Limit to period where a post can be edited

Re: Limit to period where a post can be edited

Re: Limit to period where a post can be edited

"In The Beginning Was The Word, And The Word Was Aardvark."

Re: Limit to period where a post can be edited